This should be a game all CUSA teams are pulling for an ECU victory. We have them (VT) at home. Sell out crowd.....and a senior top heavy team. I like our (ECU) chances. GO PIRATES!!!!

Beat them so badly, they have to do the Hokie Pokie all the way back to Blacksburg.

Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

And the stadium will be full... novel idea.

Good luck to the Pirates. Going to be an upset bunch of Hokies coming to Greenville.

Photo of DF getting ready


The cranes in the corners are for the aerial camera.

Thanks to bluewaterpirates on BYB for the photo

I just hope we don't get embarrassed on a National Stage. The buzz around Greenville is really crazy. We have nothing to lose and VT has all the pressure on them. GO PIRATES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is that y'alls stadium? Damn, makes Robertson look like sh.it!

Thats ole Dowdy-Ficklen. I'll post more once we get more color on the field. And don't get me started on the 7k we are adding starting in Dec

(11-03-2009 10:37 PM)WildCoog Wrote:  Is that y'alls stadium? Damn, makes Robertson look like sh.it!

Any word on a new stadium being built? I know there was some talk a while ago.

(11-03-2009 11:25 PM)ECpirate Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 10:37 PM)WildCoog Wrote:  Is that y'alls stadium? Damn, makes Robertson look like sh.it!

Any word on a new stadium being built? I know there was some talk a while ago.

Ya they are performing a study at the moment about different options, and cost yadi yadi yada. Long story short, its between rennovation the Rob or building a new one from scratch.

Sad news is, they are only building to seat 40k, current one holds 32k. In my opinion, WTF is the point. Just do it right the first time!!! Sheesh...if we are ever going to get anywhere in that school! I think the heat is affecting ppls brains.

FYI: this will be our seventh time hosting a Thursday night game on ESPN.

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

You mean for this season, right?

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

(11-04-2009 02:39 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

Show me the money!

(11-04-2009 02:52 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:39 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

Show me the money!

Winning big match-ups is worth a lot more to the conference than money. We can take big pay-outs all day long, but at the end of the day, if C-USA is looked at as a cupcake conference, then it's pointless.

(11-04-2009 02:57 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:52 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:39 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

Show me the money!

Winning big match-ups is worth a lot more to the conference than money. We can take big pay-outs all day long, but at the end of the day, if C-USA is looked at as a cupcake conference, then it's pointless.

The problem with your big match-up wins is they generate no money whatsoever. They're all well and good but at the end of the day only one school actually has generated major profits for CUSA. Money is tangible. You can spend it, rub your hands on it, use it to wipe your butt, etc....

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

I give up....who?

(11-04-2009 03:01 PM)swash Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

I give up....who?

Oh, geez...I'd hate to just give up the answer. Ok. I'll throw out hints. It's not a school in Texas and it's not Tulane.

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

What $2 Million bowl do we have?

(11-04-2009 03:20 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

What $2 Million bowl do we have?

None.

Based on last year's numbers:

Autozone Liberty-$1.7 million
St. Petersburg -$1 million
Eaglebank-$1 million
Bell Helicopter Armed Forces Bowl-$600,000
Texas Bowl-$500,000-$700,000
Sheraton Hawai'i-$398,000
R & L Carriers New Orleans-$325,000

Future:
Dallas Football Classic-$1.2 million

(11-04-2009 03:05 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 03:01 PM)swash Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

I give up....who?

Oh, geez...I'd hate to just give up the answer. Ok. I'll throw out hints. It's not a school in Texas and it's not Tulane.

Is it that school that has used FedEx money to build C-USA into the 7th BCS conference?

So we are going to have a different logo on the 50 yard line for the game tomorrow. The first report of it is on BYB. Seems interesting

any idea of what it will be?

NM Found it, we will have the Jolly Rodger at Midfield as well as new head gear, I think the skull and crossbones on the helmet instead of ECU. Not sure I like the headgear idea but the midfield logo should look sweet.

You can probably check it out on WITN on their Pirate Cam tomorrow unless they have it pointed away.

(11-04-2009 10:43 PM)Ersatz Wrote:  NM Found it, we will have the Jolly Rodger at Midfield as well as new head gear, I think the skull and crossbones on the helmet instead of ECU. Not sure I like the headgear idea but the midfield logo should look sweet.

You can probably check it out on WITN on their Pirate Cam tomorrow unless they have it pointed away.

You got source or something.... the rumors are so rampant that... well...



*******************




The scales of justice are in our favor...

GL ECU, hope your team doesn't get embarrassed like a certain team that I root for in WV did....Bring it home Pirates!

PTNC, I was reading the Headgear thing on BYB. Brian Meador said that probably won't happen but the Midfield logo will be different. As of 4PM today the logo was not on the field, during the season they never take it off.

(11-04-2009 11:41 PM)Ersatz Wrote:  PTNC, I was reading the Headgear thing on BYB. Brian Meador said that probably won't happen but the Midfield logo will be different. As of 4PM today the logo was not on the field, during the season they never take it off.

Never believe everything I hear on the internet...but...

I heard that word around the campfire is that we will have a Jolly Roger on the field. BUT.... if you saw my PR post on hte ECU board here and the rivals board there is no official blackout/purpleout/goldout but some.... ehh just read it.

I do thing hte Students are doing black out.

There will not be a blackout, TH did a press release today. TH requested that the south side wear Gold and the North Side wear Purple.

unless you want to consider the above a blackout.

http://www.ecupirates.com/genrel/110409aaa.html

(11-05-2009 12:05 AM)Ersatz Wrote:  There will not be a blackout, TH did a press release today. TH requested that the south side wear Gold and the North Side wear Purple.

unless you want to consider the above a blackout.

http://www.ecupirates.com/genrel/110409aaa.html

It will be a freaking quilt LOL.

But seriously ... his COOL idea... and hte possibility of the students following through with a blackout theme is kind of a mixed message IMO.

But he/ECU releases a PR the day before about doing a split stadium idea.... and not even local media is pumping up his idea on the news? Sounds fishy to me.

(11-05-2009 12:09 AM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 12:05 AM)Ersatz Wrote:  There will not be a blackout, TH did a press release today. TH requested that the south side wear Gold and the North Side wear Purple.

unless you want to consider the above a blackout.

http://www.ecupirates.com/genrel/110409aaa.html

It will be a freaking quilt LOL.

But seriously ... his COOL idea... and hte possibility of the students following through with a blackout theme is kind of a mixed message IMO.

But he/ECU releases a PR the day before about doing a split stadium idea.... and not even local media is pumping up his idea on the news? Sounds fishy to me.

And I agree with that statement. I don't care how the fans dress as long as we win!!!! GO PIRATES!!!

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

(11-05-2009 04:06 AM)CougarFan89 Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

I don't understand why Southern Miss gets left out of these conversations. And you do have to give Memphis hoops credit for all they've accomplished.

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Ah, yes that explains why the WAC has a tv contract that pays a third of the one CUSA has and half the bowl tie-ins. The WAC could have every team in their conference ranked(not that they will) but as long as their fan bases are smaller they will always get less money, less tv time, and less bowl games. Unless there is a significan't change in the size of CUSA's fan bases(and there won't be) it will still continue to get the same level of bowl games and tv contracts no matter how many overrated teams it has.

Flying Miner, I am making you an honorary ECU attendance nazi.

(11-05-2009 11:28 AM)Chappy Wrote:  Flying Miner, I am making you an honorary ECU attendance nazi.

Is that a good thing?

(11-05-2009 11:30 AM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 11:28 AM)Chappy Wrote:  Flying Miner, I am making you an honorary ECU attendance nazi.

Is that a good thing?

hmmmm

(11-05-2009 11:31 AM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 11:30 AM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 11:28 AM)Chappy Wrote:  Flying Miner, I am making you an honorary ECU attendance nazi.

Is that a good thing?

hmmmm

LOL, I think so, but most others do not.

(11-05-2009 11:24 AM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Ah, yes that explains why the WAC has a tv contract that pays a third of the one CUSA has and half the bowl tie-ins. The WAC could have every team in their conference ranked(not that they will) but as long as their fan bases are smaller they will always get less money, less tv time, and less bowl games. Unless there is a significan't change in the size of CUSA's fan bases(and there won't be) it will still continue to get the same level of bowl games and tv contracts no matter how many overrated teams it has.

Ummm, WAC has only one team ranked in recent memory. In the past two seasons we have had three at one point or another (I believe).

(11-05-2009 04:06 AM)CougarFan89 Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

ehh... just another win

(11-05-2009 04:06 AM)CougarFan89 Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

Perhaps. But you still cooged it to one of the worst teams in the conference. That's OK, it's Houston after all.

(11-05-2009 11:24 AM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Ah, yes that explains why the WAC has a tv contract that pays a third of the one CUSA has and half the bowl tie-ins. The WAC could have every team in their conference ranked(not that they will) but as long as their fan bases are smaller they will always get less money, less tv time, and less bowl games. Unless there is a significan't change in the size of CUSA's fan bases(and there won't be) it will still continue to get the same level of bowl games and tv contracts no matter how many overrated teams it has.

If size of fanbase matterred your Wednesday game against Tulsa would not have been your first ever appearance at home on ESPN(1).

(11-05-2009 01:21 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 04:06 AM)CougarFan89 Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

Perhaps. But you still cooged it to one of the worst teams in the conference. That's OK, it's Houston after all.

Congratulations on that win again by the way. Y'all earned that W. Buckram ran the ball down our throats over and over and over.

It's unfortunate that y'all lost to Kansas, Texas, Buffalo, Memphis, and UAB. I really wanted this to be a good year for you guys, and it really sucks that y'all are looking at 5-7 or 6-6.

(11-04-2009 02:39 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

Let's have Houston win the C-USA championship outright before we start that big talk, okay?

(11-05-2009 02:44 PM)BlazerUnit Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:39 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  Look, if you think Houston isn't doing heavy lifting for the conference this season, you're an idiot.

Let's have Houston win the C-USA championship outright before we start that big talk, okay?

I think his point is, that up until now no one outside of Houston and So Miss have won a game against an AQ-Conference team. He might be a little overzealous in his comments.

(11-05-2009 02:36 PM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 01:21 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 04:06 AM)CougarFan89 Wrote:  

(11-05-2009 02:25 AM)canewton Wrote:  

(11-04-2009 02:31 PM)Flying Miner Wrote:  

(11-03-2009 08:45 PM)CougarPoop Wrote:  Heres someone elses chance to do some heavy lifting in the conference. A signature win if you can pull it off.

I'll be rooting for you Pirates.

Heavy lifting = Earning millions for the league and delivering a $2 million dollar bowl for the conference just by being a member. Only one school in the new CUSA has done that.

More ranked teams means more TV time on major networks = better TV contract = more money for the conference.

It's okay though, you can continue to ignore the accomplishments of ECU, Tulsa, and Houston.

Exactly, UTEP hasn't done anything worthwhile to bring up the reputation of this conference. Didn't they lose like every non-conference game too? They are on their way to yet another terrible season, and sadly their only glimmer to this season will be their win against UH. They're not good, in fact overrated coming into this season, and their fans are bitter and just wanna **** on the teams that people outside of CUSA actually respect. If fans of schools like UTEP wanna say teams like UH and ECU aren't carrying this league right now, then i would love to see how they and the rest of this conference would carry on without UH, ECU, and Tulsa. Can anyone say Sun Belt II?

Perhaps. But you still cooged it to one of the worst teams in the conference. That's OK, it's Houston after all.

Congratulations on that win again by the way. Y'all earned that W. Buckram ran the ball down our throats over and over and over.

It's unfortunate that y'all lost to Kansas, Texas, Buffalo, Memphis, and UAB. I really wanted this to be a good year for you guys, and it really sucks that y'all are looking at 5-7 or 6-6.

It's a disappointment but hopefully Price will be shown the door at the end of this season. We need a young coach who will take us to the next level. There's no excuse why the school with the 2nd largest fanbase in the nonBCS (after BYU), with one of the best on campus facilities and no competition from pro and BCS teams can't be successful in football.

(11-05-2009 02:56 PM)UTEPDallas Wrote:  It's a disappointment but hopefully Price will be shown the door at the end of this season. We need a young coach who will take us to the next level. There's no excuse why the school with the 2nd largest fanbase in the nonBCS (after BYU), with one of the best on campus facilities and no competition from pro and BCS teams can't be successful in football.

PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE GET RID OF PRICE!!

HE HAS OWNED THE COOGS AND SUMLIN AS OF RECENT.

FIRE MICK PRICE